Tiktok data privacy settlement payments begin, but people are wondering about Tiktok data privacy settlement website, email, and other payout-related topics. Don’t worry, we explained everything in this article.
Like Equifax Data Breach Settlement, there are some misunderstandings. What is the TikTok Settlement payout per person? What is Tiktok data privacy settlement email? Is the TikTok data privacy settlement legit? What is Hawk marketplace? Keep reading and get all the answers and more.
Table of Contents
![$92 million Tiktok data privacy settlement payments start 2 Tiktok data privacy settlement: Website, email, payout](https://en.digitalreport.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/10/Tiktok-data-privacy-settlement-Website-email-payout-11.jpg)
Tiktok data privacy settlement payments start today
The settlement would allocate $92,000,000 to cover the administrative costs of the settlement as well as the selected plaintiffs’ and Settlement Class Members’ legitimate claimants’ attorney fees and costs. Additionally, it would offer injunctive relief to safeguard app users’ data. The Settlement compensates those whose rights the plaintiffs’ claim were infringed, releases the defendants from further obligation, and reduces the expense and risk associated with pursuing the claims.
Final approval of a $92 million settlement deal struck with the video-sharing website TikTok and its parent business, ByteDance Inc., was given by United States District Judge John Lee in Chicago on Thursday. The judge also granted class counsel from Lynch Carpenter, Bird Marella Boxer Wolpert Nessim Drooks Lincenberg & Rhow, FeganScott, and a number of other plaintiffs’ companies who worked on behalf of the class fees totaling almost $29 million.
By using and collecting users’ personal data in connection with their use of the app without providing them with adequate notice or consent, the defendants in the TikTok data privacy class action lawsuit, Beijing ByteDance Technology Co. Ltd., TikTok Inc., formerly known as Musical.ly Inc., ByteDance Inc., and Musical.ly, now known as TikTok Ltd., were charged with breaking both state and federal law.
![$92 million Tiktok data privacy settlement payments start 3 Tiktok data privacy settlement: Website, email, payout](https://en.digitalreport.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/10/Tiktok-data-privacy-settlement-Website-email-payout-6.jpg)
Tiktok data privacy settlement website
On Thursday, October 27, 2022, several TikTok users tweeted about getting an email about a legitimate data privacy settlement that had been approved. For more information, visit the official Tiktok data privacy settlement website.
TikTok data privacy settlement email
Info@tiktokdataprivacysettlement.com is the email address of the Settlement Administrator. However, a lot of people become confused when emails end in “@hawkmarketplace.com.” Verizon is a real business because it sends gift cards to its customers using the same email address.
![$92 million Tiktok data privacy settlement payments start 4 Tiktok data privacy settlement: Website, email, payout](https://en.digitalreport.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/10/Tiktok-data-privacy-settlement-Website-email-payout-2.jpg)
Is Hawk marketplace legit?
On Twitter, some users have posted pictures of emails they claim to have received about the TikTok settlement from an email address linked to Hawk Marketplace. A program called Hawk Marketplace is utilized to distribute incentives. Reward management is made possible using an online interface. Online discussion threads about the TikTok settlement suggest that information about “Virtual Prepaid Mastercards” with a value of $27.84 was part of their “Settlement payment” that was emailed.
TikTok data privacy settlement per person
The TikTok payments, depending on some conditions, are $27.84 or $167.04. What distinguishes them? The next section is where we explain it.
TikTok data privacy settlement payout
As part of the TikTok “Data Privacy Settlement,” users have been tweeting about receiving an email indicating payment of $27.84 or $167.04 has been refunded to their accounts.
According to a statement on the website, anyone who resides in Illinois and uses the TikTok app there “to generate videos” may be “entitled to up to six times the remuneration.” This could account for at least two claims of receiving virtual prepaid cards worth roughly $162. $27.84 times six equals $167.04.
Anyone who downloads the TikTok app before October 1, 2021 and resides in the United States is eligible for the global Class. Individuals from Illinois who downloaded the app before October 1, 2021 are subject to the Illinois Subclass.
Who is eligible for the TikTok data privacy settlement payments?
- Everyone who used the app and lived in the US before September 30, 2021, is included in the national class.
- All Illinois residents who used the App to create films there prior to September 30, 2021 are included in the Illinois Subclass.
![$92 million Tiktok data privacy settlement payments start 5 Tiktok data privacy settlement: Website, email, payout](https://en.digitalreport.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/10/Tiktok-data-privacy-settlement-Website-email-payout-4.jpg)
You are not a Settlement Class member and cannot submit a claim for benefits under the Settlement if you do not reside in the United States and did not use the App prior to September 30, 2021.
How many people claim TikTok data privacy settlement payment?
Out of the estimated 89 million TikTok users who were a part of the class, 1.2 million submitted claims, according to the decision announced on Thursday. A 1.4% overall claims rate is the effect of this. (A subgroup of Illinois residents who claimed that the state’s biometric privacy laws had been broken had a higher claims rate, 13%.) According to TikTok, it doesn’t collect any users’ biometric information and doesn’t infringe in any manner on their privacy.
TikTok data privacy settlement summary: What happened?
When Lee chose to grant the proposed TikTok settlement preliminary permission in September 2021, the first thing that occurred in the narrative was that the individuals who wanted to leave lost. The deal’s stringent opt-out requirements were an issue for a small number of plaintiffs’ law firms. Instead of instructing their clients to complete, sign, and send in individual opt-out forms, they claimed that law firms should be allowed to opt out every one of their clients at once through an electronic filing. According to these businesses, law firms should be able to remove all of their clients from the program with a single electronic file. Lee rejected that request.
The judge cited California trial courts allowing persons to withdraw their consent collectively. Usually, this was done in reaction to accusations that the defendants attempted to undermine existing mass arbitration efforts by using class settlements. However, Lee claimed that a slew of judgments that demanded unique applications for opt-out caused him to reconsider. This was done to prevent class members from being persuaded by the plaintiffs’ attorneys.
![$92 million Tiktok data privacy settlement payments start 6 Tiktok data privacy settlement: Website, email, payout](https://en.digitalreport.com.tr/wp-content/uploads/sites/2/2022/10/Tiktok-data-privacy-settlement-Website-email-payout-7.jpg)
Following that, the TikTok lawsuit’s claims administrator, Angeion Group LLC, received opt-out petitions for more than 2,000 class members from four plaintiffs’ law firms: the Chicago Consumer Law Center, the Clarkson Law Firm, Kind Law, and Swigart Law Group. Angeion ignored the opt-out requests, and the plaintiffs’ attorneys were informed that the settlement agreement’s terms do not permit mass opt-outs.
According to the four legal firms representing the plaintiffs in the case, the requests made by their clients to opt out were compliant with the settlement agreement. They informed Lee that, as he requested, each and every one of their clients had manually completed and signed the opt-out forms in a letter they sent to him in April of last year.
Things worsened when TikTok responded to the plaintiffs’ motion. (It is significant to notice that class counsel abstained from this conflict.) Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati’s defense attorneys claimed that the plaintiffs’ businesses had used deceptive advertising to attract clients before using the internet to obtain electronic “signatures” from persons who might not have understood what they were signing. They claimed that the plaintiffs’ law firms had committed crimes to win clients.